obfuscation through rain and bad weather

Last November I spent two weeks on the Isle of Harris running two workshops. I go to Harris specifically in November for the ‘bad’ weather and have been doing so since 2010.

Yesterday I was discussing how I enjoy making pictures where parts of the scene become hard to read / understand, or are just reduced in some way.

Had the image above been shot in fair weather, the background island of Tarransay would have more definition, and in my view, that definition would be too much information for the photograph. By using rain and fog, distant subjects become soft and sometimes veiled in a way that make them more suggestive.

The forecast for the two weeks was not ‘good’. In fact, in the 2nd week, there turned out to be two or maybe three days where the weather was so wet that we wondered if we would get out at all. We did, and I think I would be correct if I said that the group agreed that these were often the best days for atmosphere in the images we worked on and edited during our day time sessions.

I’m not afraid of the rain for my camera. I am more afraid of shooting in boring light, which to me are those days where the sun is out and the contrasts are high. There is no atmosphere to speak of, and any sense of mood or dream quality one wants to put into their work won’t be there.

Atmosphere (read that as rain, mist, and generally bad weather) is perhaps the most attractive reason for shooting landscape photographs in Scotland. My country has atmosphere in spades, and it is never present during sunny days where everything is dry and clear.

I like to obfuscate. I find mystery in what has been either left unsaid, or is presented in a way where we have to work at seeing what is there. I like things to almost disappear : to live on the edge of perception. This is one of the reasons why I like to shoot in inclement weather, and will try to work as best as I can when the weather may be challenging.

I could not create the image above in fair weather. It had to be made on one of those ‘end of the world’ days, when you feel as though the sun may never come out again. This is a regular feature of the Scottish landscape during the winter months. The gloom can be overwhelming, and it can affect one’s mood, and judgement. I have often found it intriguing that moody images often look good to view, but are rarely good experiences to shoot: we are often overcome by the mood and feeling that pervades our awareness, but rarely do I look at photos from such gloomy days and feel gloomy. I often just appreciate the qualities of light and drama in these kinds of photographs.

To me, we have to remove our feelings of how bad the weather is while shooting, and instead focus more on what these kinds of bad days provide us with in terms of quality of light, of an unusual sense of atmosphere and how this will be translated into the images we come away with.

Evolution in Compositional values

I’ve been thinking lately, how I’m finding I’m becoming more attracted to compositions that may ask the viewer to look again. What might appear at first to be one thing, may turn out to be something else entirely.

For a very long while, I have been drawn to images that do not resolve. Foggy images or images where things become less and less easy to discern - such as the faint line between snow ground and a white sky have intrigued me. I love it for instance when I can remove that line between ground and sky so that trees in the Hokkaido landscape begin to float.

I think ‘composition’ can evolve. It might even follow a common journey such as this:

  1. things are all over the place

  2. removal of extraneous subjects to make the composition cleaner

  3. a further refinement on point 2, where tonal differences are considered just as importantly as subjects are.

This I think is fairly standard. But it is only really partially complete (if composiitonal technique is ever complete - as each new subject we meet, much like a new relationship is always a new puzzle to be worked out). I think that getting your compositions to a point where things feel clean, strong and simple can lead the images to become predictable, or perhaps even boring.

After many years of finding that I’ve been on a path to simplify (without really aiming for this - it just happened for me), I am finding now that these clean compositions are fine, but that I’m now looking for something that provides a bit of an unusual angle to them. I seem to be introducing things, or being attracted to compositions where things are deliberately unclear, or slightly confusing.

Take for instance the image in this post. The main reason why I shot it was that I liked how the light sand bars in the foreground intersect with the river in the midground. I was aware at the time that they would ‘join’ in the minds-eye once compressed down into a 2D image.

For me, every time I look at it, I have to work hard to get away from the mid ground river and foreground sand being one subject. My mind immediately joins them and the result is that they no longer are a river and dunes, but instead have evolved into becoming interesting graphical curves and lines.

This is part of what happens with visual construction. Let me illustrate this by the diagram below:

3 variations of the necker cube. Some are more easy to ‘construct’ in our vision than others.

All three wire-frame objects are cubes. Except that some are more easy to see as cubes than others. I would say the easiest to understand as a cube is the middle drawing. The left image is the 2nd easiest to see as a cube while the right image is the most difficult.

Our vision is a ‘construction’. We aren’t aware of it, because the process is innate. It happens without us knowing we are ‘constructing’ what we see. Using visual illusions such as the three cubes above allows us to see the ‘construction’ in construction :-)

For a moment while you stare at the left hand drawing you don’t ‘see’ the cube, but once you do, the entire drawing seems to morph in your mind’s eye.

This is the kind of optical confusion that I enjoy in some compositions. The image I shot in Lençóis Maranhenses last May does exactly the same thing. Upon first glance you see shapes and lines, and it is only after some understanding that you notice that the sand in the foreground is intersecting with the mid ground river. That what you are looking at is sand and water, not a graphical shape made up of curves and lines.

In a sense, most of my editing life, I would have tried to avoid this confusion, and would have worked to make these two areas of the picture separate. But I quite like marrying two areas of the frame together via tonal similarities if I feel the result may bring forth an image that is less conservative compositionally speaking.

I do think there is room in our imagery and compositions to introduce tension or deliberate confusion. But I think if these things happen during the early stages of us learning to compose we look at them as problems we have to eradicate. It is only after some time of working with compositions where things are clean, clear of intention, that one starts to wish to introduce some kind of tension back into the work.

Lençóis Portfolio

Here is the completed 18 images from my trip to Lençóis Maranhenses national park in Brazil last May. I don’t intend to add it to the portfolio section of my website as yet, as I wish to work on most of the portfolios for last year over the coming months, and then create a brand new page for 2022.

In the meantime, I hope you enjoy looking at these. I am running a tour there this coming May and have a couple of spaces left, if you like the simple / abstract nature of the work in this landscape. It’s a beautiful place to be.

All the images here were shot on Fuji Velvia film (and desaturated in the edit stage). The colours can be more vibrant in Lençóis, but I was going for a more dramatic look to the work this year. I feel I have been working with bright luminance for some time and wished to return to some darker tones). All the films were processed at home in my development machine. I am so delighted with my decision to process my own films in future, and now feel as though I have filled in the last gap to the entire lifecycle of image creation. I am entirely in control of the process from capture to print.

Lençóis Dusk #2

The first night I was in the dunes, I walked over several ‘hills’ of sand, moving further and further away from the small oasis we were sleeping at. At the final moment when the sun was really fading I found this particular curve.

More images to follow on my monthly newsletter. I’ve been processing films all week and have managed to get through 160 rolls. Editing the Brazil images because that is what I found most interesting to work on: I felt excited, and keen to work on them. So they will be in the next newsletter.

I’m off to Japan next week to run my Hokkaido tour, so this is the last film post for a wee while.

Dusk, Lenćóis Maranhenses, Brazil

Dusk. It’s such a special time.

The light is fading, and somehow I find my feelings about life, where I am, and what is to come, surface in my thoughts.

Watching the hues change on a sand dune as the colour temperature moves from daylight to dusk is always a special time for me. These feelings about life, the past, the future, are often eclipsed by the feelings of ‘now’. Photography seems to do one of two things for me: I am either living in the present moment, or I find that I become invisible to myself. All thoughts and worries dissolve, and in a way, it’s the best form of meditation that I have in my life.

I loved the latter part of my private trip to Lençóis. I had booked to travel around the periphery of the park in a Toyota Hilux, and these moments were the best: being able to direct my driver and guide, to be able to navigate over great distances to reach a vantage point that I thought may work for the photographs I wished to compose really helped.

I am now busy working on the set of images I made last May. I am so glad I bought my own film processor and I am finding the results from the home development are better than what I have had from many labs this past decade.

First image edit in almost a year

I am around 2/3rds of the way through processing my backlog of images from last year. In case you do not know the back story to this: I lost faith in my film lab of 8 years this year as they kept ruining my films. So I opted to raise the money to buy an automatic film processor and learn to process my own films.

My first scan of my own processed images.

The image above is the very first image I have edited of my own work in about a year. Proudly : it is a film I processed myself at home in my automatic film processor. Editing it is the final proof for me that the processing is working, because when you add curve adjustments to the film scans, if there is any problem with the processing of the substrates in the film - they will become evident.

I will be heading to Japan in about a week’s time, so I do not think I will have any time to work on the backlog of work I’ve just processed. I do not like to look upon the ‘editing’ stage of my work as ‘post-processing’. I really dislike this term, as it almost makes the editing stage feel as though it is like doing my laundry: a chore, and more importantly: an after fact of the fieldwork.

Editing to me, is a highly inspiring, creative place to be. I love editing my because I get lost in the material. Each adjustment of tone and luminosity brings forth an immediate emotional response. It is not a part of the image making process that I would like to think of as a ‘task’ or ‘chore’, but more so as a ‘creative space’.

So I would prefer to work on my images when I feel the drive to do so. Not because of some schedule, or deadline.

In some ways, I have always enjoyed having a small backlog of images to work on. To me, it is like having a well with water in it. If I have no images to work on at all, then the well feels as though it is dry. For years I had always worried that if I took too long to get round to working on images, I would either never get round to them, or simply lose interest. But it is not uncommon for me now to hold onto work for many years before I choose to work on it (Senja from February 2020 is one such case).

Anyway, I feel heartened to know that I am now in complete control of the entire process: capture, processing, editing and printing. Now that I have walked through the film-processing part of it for a solid week, I now see that it is not so difficult if one has an automated processor. I will write up an entry about my Dev.a film processor at some point. But I feel I should really work with it for at least half a year before giving any opinions about it. I would say right now, that I am very happy with the machine and it is living up to the hopes I had to be able to run around 12 to 24 rolls of film a day through it, without feeling like my house or kitchen where it resides, is turned into a laboratory.

Postamble: I would like to thank Kyriakos Kalorkoti for inviting me round to his house several times to go through the E6 process, albeit with a manual processor. Kyriakos instilled in me that I need to be methodical, and ensure that there is no contamination in the chemicals.

I would also like to thank Robert Salisbury for offering to stop by on his way home from making images in the highlands, to help me alter my kitchen and install plumbing so I could get the Dev.a film processor up and running.

Can we really trust our vision?

In short: no.

I’ve been fascinated for years as to why there is a disconnect between what we ‘see’ when composing out in the field and what we often have on or memory cards / films. It’s a rabbit hole that one can disappear down, and that is exactly what I did. I learned that the human visual system has its own innate processing: everything we see is a ‘construction’ in our mind, and it happens so innately that we aren’t even aware of it.

Illusions such as this one by Science Girl are great at illustrating that what we see is a construction that happens in our mind’s eye. Once you begin to understand that ‘seeing’ is not ‘truth’, this gives you the freedom to realise that everything is open to interpretation, and once we know we are doing this, we can choose to go anywhere we want with our imagery.

Film Lab

I managed to process my first roll of film successfully on Christmas day. It is now the 29th, and I’ve processed around 40 rolls of film.

There hasn’t been a lot to figure out, but one bit of advice I would give anyone who decides to give film processing a go, is to read the documentation thoroughly. I noticed some of my films weren’t as vibrant as others, and when I looked into this, there are a couple of points to understand:

  1. Each kit processes around 12 rolls. As you get towards the end of the process run, the chemicals are getting tired, and the manufacturer tends to have a range of process times. The chemicals most critical for this as the first developer and colour developer. It took me about 3 days to figure out that I need to have 2 separate programs for my automatic film processor. Since I do two processes, each with 6 rolls loaded into one drum, I needed to use the times for 6 rolls, and for 12 rolls chemical exhaustion. Once I figured that out, the films are all looking really nice :-)

  2. Fuji films require a bit more processing that other films apparently. Something like 15% more. I haven’t gone anywhere near this as yet - I am quite happy with what the Bellini E6 kits are doing, but I am going to experiment. I’ve been advised to add a further 30 seconds on to each of the programmed processes I have. So this is interesting, as there is no documentation about this - I just found it on a forum, and someone pointed to a JOBO instruction manual which claims most Fujicrhomes require a bit more processing.

  3. You need to go do a bit more research, and understand that you’ll be on a learning curve for a while.

There is something very special about opening the lid of the drum to take the films out once processed. I have to go stick them in a stabiliser chemical mix for around a minute before I can go and hang them up to dry. I have noticed that sometimes the film curls and can end up touching the other parts of the film, so the stabiliser does not get to cover the film 100%. When that happens, I can end up with a streak in the middle of the film. It is recoverable by simply putting the film back into the stabiliser (a soapy bath) for another minute and make sure it’s evenly distributed. The streaks disappear.

But as I say: something very exciting seeing my films come out and get a glimpse of them before I leave them to hang.

Rather than feeling this is a chore that I’d prefer to hand off to someone else, I really enjoy processing my films, and it’s really nice to be involved now, with all parts of the process: Capture, Process, Edit and Print. Something very special and engaging about being involved all the way through that I can’t explain.

Delighted with where things are going, and I just need to order up a few more process kits, as I still have quite a few rolls to do !


The Dev.a film processor

Just a quick word on the film processor by Analogico. There are a few ‘gotcha’s that anyone approaching film processing has to be aware of. Being methodical, and doing a proper ‘reset’ before each new chemical mix is advisable, irrespective of whether you buy an automatic film processor or doing it manually. The Dev.a machine takes a lot of pain out of the process, is extremely well built.

I’ve had a few questions to ask about it over the past week and the support team have been extremely responsive. I normally get a reply within an hour or so, and the support is very knowledgeable. I’m still such a newbie to all of this and I really want to support any company that goes into making a film processing machine in this day and age. It is quite an undertaking, and I think they have taken the right approach to be as proactive as they can on any after sales support. This is in my view, going to help the machine be a success.

First Films Processed

The new film development machine is a beauty. I just got my first films out of the machine last night around 1am in the morning, and I am delighted.

It has been around three weeks of problems. Mainly due to either me not knowing something rather critical, or just bad luck. I have spent a small fortune in wasted E6 chemical sets, but I had anticipated that I would mess up quite a bit, and probably will continue to do so for some time to come. There is a learning curve, and I have found that I always need to give anything new at least a year, before I can give a valid appraisal of it.

The Dev.a film development machine is extremely well built and thought out, but that does not mean you can just put the films in and not think about things. I have found that I have to be extremely methodical in what I’m doing. For instance, I have an independent measuring jug for each chemical. I do not mix them, as this is going to cause problems for sure……

As for mixing and pouring chemicals, it is paramount that no contamination happens. It has been surprising to me to find out how easily I can put something down on a workbench, into a pool of liquid, only to ask myself ‘what is that?’.

First I found that I managed to spill chemicals outside of their trays, and so I ended up going to the local hardware store here in Edinburgh to buy some giraffe watering cans. They have long necks, so I’m able to pour the mix into each tray without suffering spill over.

Then a crucial part of the machine broke on me. I appreciate that the Dev.a is very much a young product. It’s a small company and so I can appreciate there will be teething problems with the machine. It was good to find out that their support is excellent. Very quick response, and very quick solutions also. I was posted a replacement fix for this which is more robust than what came with the machine.

The biggest error I made was buying 5 litre processing kits, and assuming I could mix up 1litre at a time. No no no no no! You need to mix up the entire 5 litres, as the dilution of the 5 L kit is quite different from the 1 L kits. I had two weeks of seriously underexposed images and it was only when I did a 2nd process on one of the 5 L kits that I realised some of the bottles were more than 50% empty. It dawned on me that the mix I was using was incorrect.

I am also finding that when I am loading the films onto the reels in the little silver dark tent I have, that it is becoming much easier each time I do it. I had done several practice runs, just sitting on my sofa with my eye’s closed, and when things don’t work - it’s good to have a look to see why you’re getting stuck. There are a few little ‘gotcha’s that once you know what’s going on, makes all the difference when trying to fix it inside the dark tent.

So, I think my Christmas is going to be full of processing films. I have around 160 rolls to do from the past year.

This has given me a lot of inner peace. I sometimes feel that if you want to do something properly, you really need to do it yourself. I got sick of putting my trust in film labs to do a good job this past 8 years or so. I think Covid has knocked many businesses and supply chains to smithereens.

Off to process more films…..

Merry Xmas.