This past weekend, I was in Torridon conducting a weekend workshop. We had some very rainy weather, and one of the group – Steve – mentioned to me that he was glad the weather had been bad, as it gave him a chance to see he could actually make some good images despite the weather.
I often feel, that the reason why Scotland is so photogenic, is because of the changes in the weather. One minute it’s misty, the next it’s clear. And fog or low cloud levels can be a great way of making simpler images. Take the shot above for instance. This is Loch Maree. Normally, this group of trees have the massive Slioch mountain dominating the background. But with a bit of rain and poor visibility, Slioch was invisible. We were left with no horizon – nothing to give the shot context.
I loved the group of three or four trees clumped together. They were actually a subset of a larger group of trees, but I felt that we could easily ‘remove’ the rest and keep the entire shot very simple if we just had this small gathering of trees.
I made this shot on my little Lumix GF1. It’s a great camera because it has interchangeable aspect ratios. I felt that square worked really well for this shot, as I could easily place the trees in three quadrants of the frame – top right, bottom right and middle right, as you can see in the above triptych. Question is, is one better than the other? And I like to consider that there is always more options than just one. So I guess the answer is ‘it depends’. My personal favourite composition out of the three images is the first one. I feel the picture has a more ‘uplifting’ feeling than the rest, and it has more presence, because I’m really exaggerating the empty space in the frame more than the others. I also love the reflection of the trees…. I feel they have space below them to ‘breathe’.
The middle composition, where the trees are placed in the bottom right, is perhaps less engaging for me, because the trees aren’t so tight against the bottom of the frame. The picture feels less focussed for me, in terms of composition. I’d liked to have moved the trees even further down the frame, but I felt the reflections would not have enough space. I felt I had to keep moving the trees further up the frame. But it’s a more relaxed composition than the first one – which I feel is more ‘graphic’ than being a photograph.
The far right composition is perhaps my less favourite. It is more of a ‘standard’ composition. I feel the horizon has been carelessly composed – for my taste. It’s just a little below centre, and I think it might have benefited from being slightly above centre – giving that ‘uplifting’ feeling I was talking about in the first image, while at the same time, being more in-line with a ‘standard’ landscape image.
As much as I love square, maybe it might have suited more a 4×5 aspect ration as seen above?
Ultimately, when you have a simple subject such as this – trees and reflection, and nothing else, it’s much easier to get down to the basic tasks of composition and placement in a frame. The less objects you have in the frame – the better, I feel.
I was immediately attracted to this scene when we were driving past, because there’s little in there to distract. When was the last time you went out with your camera to shoot when the atmospheric pressure is so low, that almost nothing is visible?